Obama's Energy Plan: Changeless, Hopeless, Clueless
Friday, June 27, 2008 at 10:07AM Barack Obama has announced that his energy policy will cut our imports of foreign oil in half by 2030. Truly, the man is clueless. Twenty-two years??? We don't have that kind of time.
Obama espouses the changeless energy policy which the Democratic Party has followed for the past 30 years: alternate fuels, conservation, and bashing big oil. I have my own list of criticisms of the petroleum industry, but let's be realistic about this: these are business corporations; they exist for the purpose of making a profit for their stockholders. Attacking the oil companies for doing what they are designed to do is like cursing salmon because they swim upstream to spawn. It permits Congresspersons an opportunity to posture and spew for the news media but accomplishes nothing.
In my family, we are all for conservation and we've done our part year after year. We have energy-star stuff wherever I look. I have always owned fuel-efficient vehicles. We have recycled a small mountain of newspapers, bottles, cans, plastics, and aluminum (I started with newspaper drives in Cub Scouts 50 years ago). We have the energy-efficient light bulbs. But there is only so much more we can do, and I suspect the same is true for most American families.
Alternate fuels aren't ready to take up the slack. Corn ethanol has problems, not the least of which is disruption in the supply of corn. Renewable energy sources are beginning to come on line, but they are nowhere near enough to fill the gap. The Department of Energy projects that renewable energy will supply 12.6 per cent of electricity generation by 2030. That is simply not enough.
The only answer is to increase the domestic supply of petroleum and increase the use of coal and nuclear energy for generation of electricity. The response of most Democrats has been to make disingenuous arguments, such as the squawks about compelling oil companies to drill on existing leases where the geologists have found no oil, and to blame George Bush for this problem, which he manifestly did not create. It seems as if all sins are to be blamed on Bush - - if you point out to a Democrat that his shoelace is untied, he shouts, "Bush!" I didn't vote for W. either time, folks, but I believe that criticisms must be fair and credit should be given where it is due.
A short while ago, I directed the following series of questions to my Democratic Party friends:
- - What Democratic Party initiatives to support drilling of Rocky Mountain oil shale have the Republicans blocked?
- - What Democratic proposals to increase domestic refinery capacity have the Republicans thwarted?
- - Which Democratic-sponsored legislation to permit offshore drilling have the Republicans deep-sixed?
- - What Democratic Party movement to support drilling in ANWR has been suppressed by the Republican Party?
- - Which Democratic proposals to build clean-coal power plants have the Republicans resisted?
- - What Democratic program to encourage and enable the construction of nuclear power plants has been killed by the Republican Party?
To date, the only answers I get are: none, none, none, none, none, and none.
The Obama energy plan offers no change and no hope. What we need is a plan which will restore confidence in our energy supply, too much of which is now in the hands of crazy people who hate us. We don't necessarily need a plan which will cut the price, although that would be nice; we need stability and reliability. Newt Gingrich's "Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less" initiative will provide that. We can live with $3.00 gas; we can live with $4.00 gas; we can't live with the uncertainty of a foreign energy supply, and we can't live with $10.00 gas in the near term.
Related posts:
The Price of Gas: Pelosi Fixes The Blame
In Obamamerica, There Won't Be A Middle Class
Hiding The Truth, Internet Style - - And A Conservative Response
Barack Obama Is The Dr. No of Energy Security
JOIN US! Visit American Sentinel
Sign the petitions:
American Solutions: The Lexington Project (loads slow):





Reader Comments (2)
The intellectual dishonesty coming out the Obama camp is truly astonishing. This morning on one of the early A.M. news shows I saw one of his shills responding to a "drill her drill now"supporter saying how average(particularlly low income)americans were struggling just to get work.
The response was 1st, "We can't drill our way out this", excuse me but does anybody know any other method to attain oil?
2nd response was we need to develope alternative sources of energy like wind/solar power and energy conservation.
WHAT? Wind is the enemy when comes to fuel efficient autos, it is callled wind resistance, and is why our cars are ever more streamlined.
Additionally if we somehow miraculously developed an affordable battery tommorow that would meet these needs, That would prove calamitous, if at this time we ALL came home from work and plugged into our decrepit and out dated power-grid, it would simply collapse.
The move to rebuild our infra-structure to support these sytems once they are invented, will take decades! Inthe mean time we need to drill here and drill now, and let the energy companies invest in the R&D and supporting infra-strucure for the future.
I do not think much of the Obama plan or the McCain plan but I do like the Pickens Plan. I will take the energy security plan from a financial genius and life long oil man like T. Boone Pickens over either of the candidates for POTUS any day. They should both consider his plan I think.